The long-peddaled narrative of Bangladesh as the "New Asian Tiger," lauded for its exceptional GDP growth during the Hasina-era, is a dangerous facade that masks a deep-seated crisis of financial malfeasance and national security vulnerability.

While the world applauded the economic performance, the post-August 5th economic review has exposed a crippling hemorrhage. An estimated $16 billion is siphoned off annually through money laundering, totaling a staggering $240 billion over the last 15 years.

This is economic sabotage that has crippled the domestic banking system and impaired Bangladesh's international trade standing.

With public attention fixated on growth figures and politics, this massive financial rot–which amounts to a colossal security vulnerability–has gone largely unaddressed.

Despite a seemingly impressive rise in conventional military strength, reaching 20th on the Lowy Institute’s Asia Power Index and 35th on Global Firepower's latest report, this military posture is fundamentally fragile.

The country's defense is alarmingly reliant on imported weapons systems. For years, the majority of armaments, including essential platforms like fighter jets and submarines, were sourced from China via soft loans.

More recently, Türkiye has become a major partner, introducing NATO-standard platforms like Bayraktar TB2 drones. While this diversification is a tactical improvement, it merely trades one external dependency for another.

The critical strategic flaw is the failure to indigenize arms production. An insufficient defense budget has made it impossible to secure the necessary self-reliance, leaving the country strategically exposed to external supply chain shocks and geopolitical pressures.

The government’s response to these looming threats is not a determined surge in capability, but a retreat. Even as the security landscape demands greater preparedness amid escalating major power rivalries and regional tensions, the government has inexplicably cut its defense budget.

 For the current fiscal year, Bangladesh allocated Tk 40,698 crore, a reduction of 3.1% from the previous year. This deliberate disinvestment in national security, while hundreds of billions are simultaneously siphoned off by financial criminals represents a dangerous state of delusion.

The necessity for indigenous defense production is now an absolute imperative. Instead of passively importing high-cost foreign platforms, Bangladesh must aggressively pivot to negotiating technology transfers and co-production agreements with foreign partners.

Because the path to autonomy begins with a focus on low- to mid-tier military technologies: small arms, surveillance equipment, drones, and naval crafts.

This must be a joint effort, leveraging private industries and engineering universities under tight governmental supervision. Furthermore, the country must strategically invest in dual-use industries–electronics, and AI–to ensure that investments serve both civilian market growth and military preparedness.

Prioritizing curricula in product design and programming is the foundational work of future deterrence.

Lack of vision

But the most damning indictment of Bangladesh’s strategic failure is the absence of a coherent vision.

The military and security response remains reactive and crisis-driven because the nation fundamentally lacks a formal National Security Strategy.

Without this guiding doctrine, the country is unable to integrate modern warfare concepts–from hybrid warfare and grey zone tactics to countering technological disruption and disinformation campaigns–into its conventional planning.

The lack of a national war strategy, an emergency response plan, or even a basic white paper on naval doctrine means Bangladesh cannot showcase a credible deterrence posture to its adversaries.

The lack of a guiding national security strategy is compounded by a striking strategic communication vacuum within the Armed Forces. The crucial C-3 (Command, Control, and Communication) structure is effectively mute when it matters most.

Bangladesh’s military machine is ill-equipped to manage perceptions, counter misinformation, or synchronize the government's narrative during a low-intensity conflict or crisis.

It is a fundamental vulnerability that leaves the state open to informational warfare.

While the Inter Services Public Relations Directorate (ISPR) is officially tasked with projecting the military's stance and disseminating timely information, its reach is dangerously limited.

It consistently fails to penetrate remote areas or reach populations without easy access to electronic media, creating information gaps that adversary actors eagerly exploit.

This operational deficiency, coupled with poor coordination among different military and civilian units, leads to public confusion and amplified security risks.

Highly sensitive regions like the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) are particularly vulnerable, where the rapid spread of doctored images and inflammatory rhetoric has repeatedly exacerbated ethnic tensions and incited large-scale violence.

The simple act of deploying effective, tailored strategic communication and engaging both military and civilian stakeholders could be a low-cost, high-impact method to substantially mitigate these risks.

The nation’s strategic sight is also stubbornly earthbound. Bangladesh lags dramatically in space and satellite-based security technologies, a vulnerability that is often dismissed as irrelevant to its current socio-economic struggles.

This is a critical error. While the 2018 launch of Bangabandhu Satellite-1 provided commercial television and data services, it offered no significant military implications. In an age where air dominance and satellite intelligence define the future of warfare, Bangladesh's aerial security dimension suffers from unsustainable and incompetent capabilities.

Without serious investment in space-based assets–the ultimate high-ground for communication, surveillance, and deterrence–the country is effectively fighting a 21st-century battle with 20th-century tools.

The nation's strategic fragility extends high into the atmosphere, rendering the defense posture dangerously obsolete.

Vulnerable position in the neighbourhood

In stark contrast to Bangladesh's outdated defense posture, its neighbors are rapidly ascending into the space domain.

India, for instance, currently operates 56 satellites and aims to triple that number by 2040 to match developed nations.

This strategic disparity, where a major regional player leverages space for communication, surveillance, and defense, leaves Bangladesh profoundly disadvantaged.

By failing to compete in this crucial arena, Dhaka is effectively cornering itself in the regional balance of power. The country’s reluctance to invest in space technology is not merely a technological lag; it is a failure of strategic vision that actively diminishes its national power.

The most alarming structural failure, however, lies in the nation's intelligence mechanism. The perception that Bangladesh lacks an effective intelligence system is not idle chatter; it is substantiated by two profound, avoidable national crises.

First, the Rohingya influx: Was the government entirely blind to the impending flood of refugees near its border, or did its intelligence assessment spectacularly fail? Whatever the specific breakdown, Bangladesh is now the victim of one of the world's largest refugee crises, currently hosting over 1.15 million Rohingyas.

This massive humanitarian and security burden is the direct consequence of a strategic intelligence failure to anticipate or adequately prepare for a major regional upheaval.

Second, the recent pushback incidents by India are a clear red flag. Did Bangladesh's intelligence establishment fail to seriously consider the implications of India's National Register of Citizens (NRC) and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA)?

These policies fundamentally created the legal and political grounds for potential illegal migration. The result: since May 7, 2025, at least 1,900 people, including legal Indian citizens, have reportedly been unlawfully pushed into Bangladeshi territory, with another 1,500 people pushed between May and June of that year.

Bangladesh is now grappling with illegal immigrant intrusions across its borders. This is a staggering vulnerability that, with proper intelligence foresight and political commitment, could have been anticipated and mitigated.

We have to understand that prosperity without security is an illusion. Bangladesh must stop mistaking GDP growth for genuine national strength.

The aforementioned strategic fault lines–crippling financial crime, military over-dependence, a vacuum of strategic doctrine, limited soft power projection, and an utterly deficient intelligence system–must be addressed immediately.

The nation requires immediate action to strengthen its Armed Forces with realistic funding and competent, indigenously produced technologies. Failure to mitigate these risks now is an open invitation for adversaries to exploit the nation’s deepest vulnerabilities.

—

Md. Asraf Ali is a Dhaka-based independent researcher. He studies International Relations in the Institute of South Asian Studies at Sichuan University of China