At a recent Bangladesh Business Forum organized seminar in Dhaka, economist Hossain Zillur Rahman, head of the Power and Participation Research Centre, dropped some troubling data.

Poverty, he said, has soared to 28 percent, compared with the government’s 2022 figure of 18.7 percent. “We are going in the opposite direction,” he warned, blaming a slowing economy.

On the surface, the claim is damning: more than a 10-point spike in just three years. But Dr Zillur’s presentation carried a glaring omission. He never clarified when the increase took place–before or after the interim government assumed power on August 5, 2024.

That omission matters as it leaves listeners with the impression that poverty exploded under the current administration, a claim that stretches credulity.

Poverty rates rarely balloon in a vacuum. Historically, sharp spikes are tied to twin shocks: mass job losses and runaway inflation. When the two collide–as in Indonesia during the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis–millions can fall into poverty almost overnight.

Political collapse can have the same effect, as Sri Lanka’s recent meltdown showed.

Bangladesh, however, has experienced neither. Since taking over, the interim government has steered the economy away from the brink, stabilizing an IMF-dependent system, keeping growth in positive territory, and even taming inflation.

None of the classic triggers of poverty explosions–economic contraction, spiraling prices, mass unemployment–have been present.

Which raises the question: how plausible is it that poverty has surged in a growing economy where the cost of living is easing?

Unless one is prepared to believe that the interim government has achieved the rare feat of shrinking poverty data while expanding poverty itself, Zillur Rahman’s figures deserve far closer scrutiny than they received in Dhaka.

Vagueness in methods and definitions

Besides, the credibility of the PPRC’s findings is shaky at best. Dr. Zillur has yet to disclose how the survey was conducted, what sampling methods were used, or even who carried it out.

No serious researcher would accept numbers without that basic transparency. Sound methodology is meaningless without competent execution, and absent those details, the dramatic claim that 28 percent of Bangladeshis now live in poverty collapses under its own weight.

Even more troubling is Dr Zillur’s slippery use of definitions. He invokes “poverty” as if it were a universally fixed concept, but fails to specify whether he means income poverty, extreme poverty, or multi-dimensional poverty.

These distinctions matter. Lumping them together only muddies the debate and confuses the public. Precision, not rhetorical flourish, is what the conversation demands–particularly from someone of Hossain Zillur’s stature.

The same pattern of vagueness mars his remarks on employment. Citing “disguised unemployment” at “epidemic levels,” he points to youth frustration as proof.

But what does “disguised unemployment” even mean in the 21st century? The global labor market has been transformed by freelancing platforms, remote work, and cross-border digital employment.

Thousands of young Bangladeshis now code, design, or consult for multinational firms from laptops in their bedrooms or coffee shops. They don’t fit neatly into traditional employment categories, yet Zillur’s sweeping claim makes no room for this reality.

Worse, he offered no data–only anecdotes dressed up as social diagnosis.

Careful omissions to support narratives

To his credit, Dr. Zillur ended on a note of clarity. He was right: the global economy is undergoing seismic shifts, and Bangladesh cannot lean forever on garments and remittances.

Diversification into pharmaceuticals, agriculture, IT services, and leather is imperative. For this, he deserves commendation.

But here again, his analysis is incomplete. He fails to acknowledge that the interim government has already begun laying the groundwork for precisely the kind of transformation he prescribes.

Separating tax policy from collection at the National Revenue Board–a reform long resisted–was a structural step forward.

The launch of the National Single Window, integrating more than 20 agencies and streamlining over 50,000 licenses at the click of a button, marks a real leap in cutting red tape.

Tariff and logistics policies are being fast-tracked, port operations upgraded, and sector-specific bottlenecks in pharmaceuticals, leather, electronics, shipbuilding, and agro-processing actively addressed.

These are reforms in motion, aligning squarely with the vision Zillur outlines.

This is why his choice of alarmist soundbites over balanced recognition is so disappointing. As one of Bangladesh’s most respected economists, Dr Zillur has the stature to elevate public discourse with rigor and fairness.

Instead, his reliance on selective citations and vague assertions risks reducing him to a populist commentator. That undermines not only his credibility, but also the seriousness of the debate over how Bangladesh can graduate into a more resilient, competitive economy.

—